NovU wrote:It's funny because now people begin to question Kobe's shot selections and all that being possibly a team cancer because he's arguably having the most productive season of his career.
shadowgrin wrote:NovU wrote:It's funny because now people begin to question Kobe's shot selections and all that being possibly a team cancer because he's arguably having the most productive season of his career.
His shot selections are questionable because the Lakers have two of the best offensive post players in the league right now and he doesn't give it more to them.
He's a team cancer because the Lakers have two of the best offensive post players in the league right now and he doesn't give it more to them.
Andrew wrote:shadowgrin wrote:NovU wrote:It's funny because now people begin to question Kobe's shot selections and all that being possibly a team cancer because he's arguably having the most productive season of his career.
His shot selections are questionable because the Lakers have two of the best offensive post players in the league right now and he doesn't give it more to them.
He's a team cancer because the Lakers have two of the best offensive post players in the league right now and he doesn't give it more to them.
Questions about Kobe's shot selection aren't exactly a recent development either. That critique has been fairly constant over the years, though it's been dulled at times by tremendous scoring performances and of course, scores of regular season victories and a couple of championships.
Sit wrote:I would probably agree that Jackson must have had some kind of hold on Kobe that Mike Brown doesn't have right now because Kobe is simply playing like he did in 06-07.
Sit wrote:Jackson must have had some kind of hold on Kobe that Mike Brown doesn't have right now because Kobe is simply playing like he did in 06-07.
z02 wrote:Luke Walton, Smush Parker, and Kwame Brown were the 3rd, 4th, and 5th leading scorers on that team. That team was going NOWHERE. Kobe and Odom were the only notable players on that team.
benji wrote:LeBron is such a choker. And people were talking about him as an all-time great. As having possibly surpassed Kobe. What a joke.
velvet bliss wrote:Andrew, you the real MVP.
Andrew wrote:He who flops and flails to the Finals and a title, flops and flails best.
Kamilli LakeShow Bryant wrote:This team needs him to be more of a facilitator, especially with his high basketball IQ which i seriously start to doubt at this point.
Kamilli LakeShow Bryant wrote:Call me crazy, but i seriously see that with trading KOBE for PAUL, if it was possible, Lakers would be better off. Paul with Bynum, Gasol, maybe Odom and all those 3 point shooters? SCARY
NovU wrote:Kamilli LakeShow Bryant wrote:This team needs him to be more of a facilitator, especially with his high basketball IQ which i seriously start to doubt at this point.
You are saying it like Kobe was ever a facilitator. He's always been a shot happy scorer no matter whom he played with.Kamilli LakeShow Bryant wrote:Call me crazy, but i seriously see that with trading KOBE for PAUL, if it was possible, Lakers would be better off. Paul with Bynum, Gasol, maybe Odom and all those 3 point shooters? SCARY
You are stating the obvious. 3rd year into the pro, Paul was already better than Kobe ever was.
Andrew wrote:A two point home loss to the Pacers and Kobe scoring 33 points on 30 shots definitely isn't an encouraging sign. Give credit where its due to the Pacers, they are having a good season, but the Lakers are better than that. Still a lot of regular season left, but Magic Johnson's prediction of them ending up a .500 team perhaps isn't quite as melodramatic as it seemed.
Andrew wrote:On the bright side, they do have a roster that is capable of playing better than their record would suggest and there is two thirds of the season left to go. I don't know if they can really make any significant trades this season that don't involve them giving up Bynum and/or Gasol, so improving their roster is easier said than done with the players they would and should be willing to give up. If Howard or another star is on the table though, they'd at least have to strongly consider it.
At this point, I think they basically have to work it out with the personnel they have in place and wait until they have a bit more leverage to swing a blockbuster deal or maybe a couple of smaller (but still substantial) trades.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests