Tue Jun 15, 2004 5:21 am
I heard it on the radio, some guy named Vick the Brick Jacobs said it. He works for a local sports radio station in L.A. XTRA SPORTS 1150 AM and always has inside info on the Lakers. I also heard today that Fox,Kobe,Shaq,Devean, and Fisher approached Phil to start them in game 4 because they had the most experience running the triangle. According to this same source Phil said he would think about and would discuss it with the rest of the team. Mabey Phil will do it in game 5. I don't think you want Fox or George on Sheed though.
Tue Jun 15, 2004 5:58 am
gloveGuy wrote:I actually think the triangle sucks. The Pistons can defend it well and Phil needs to realize this.
[/color]
Tue Jun 15, 2004 6:38 am
Tue Jun 15, 2004 7:23 am
gloveGuy wrote:I just think it's dated and the Pistons have found a way to defend it. The Lakers don't play their best as a half-court team; they do as a fastbreak team. The Lakers would play a better triangle if they started Derek Fisher, but they don't because logically you play the better player -- Gary Payton. Yet Phil continues the triangle when he should play an offense more to Payton's strengths.
Tue Jun 15, 2004 7:30 am
Tue Jun 15, 2004 7:31 am
Tue Jun 15, 2004 7:35 am
Tue Jun 15, 2004 7:54 am
Tue Jun 15, 2004 7:57 am
The Lakers don't play their best as a half-court team; they do as a fastbreak team. The Lakers would play a better triangle if they started Derek Fisher, but they don't because logically you play the better player -- Gary Payton. Yet Phil continues the triangle when he should play an offense more to Payton's strengths
Tue Jun 15, 2004 8:16 am
Anyways, it's been a dismal series for Kobe, Tayshaun is all over him, he's forcing it. Jackson was all over him too on one of the plays, I think it was when he went to block Rip & Billups hit that huge three. Jackson was pissed, he gave it to Bryant during the time-out and Bryant finally just nodded, as if saying, ok, ok, it's my fault in exasperation.
Shaq is still the MVP, I'm sorry to all Kobe fans, but Shaq is still the MVP. Please don't tell me that if he's the MVP, why arent they winning, they are not winning because the role players are not making their shots, they are getting looks but they just aren't converting. Ofcourse, nothing taken from Detroit's smothering defence. I'm pissed about this win, do they even want to win? How can Shaq be the only one producing, is this the height of patheticness or what, come on, play some team basketball and some team defence. They seem to be most relaxed about whatever is happening.![]()
Tue Jun 15, 2004 8:26 am
Tue Jun 15, 2004 8:31 am
Tue Jun 15, 2004 8:33 am
Tue Jun 15, 2004 8:40 am
Tue Jun 15, 2004 8:50 am
magius wrote:i feel your pain![]()
i couldnt kall whatshisface robin, because robin isnt allergic to kryptonite, thus the reference would be illogical. i feel smart now, i used big words.
um, anyway i love the pistons, now this is a real team, they stick to their system and do what they're told. If this was spurs pistons we would be lucky if the scores totalled 100 together
Tue Jun 15, 2004 8:53 am
Psycho Jackal wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
That's for the person that know's who it's for.
Tue Jun 15, 2004 8:56 am
Tue Jun 15, 2004 9:10 am
Tue Jun 15, 2004 9:17 am
Tue Jun 15, 2004 9:17 am
magius wrote:you know its not going to be as fun around here with the laker crowd gone........ i mean, who are we going to flaunt our vastly superior intelligence too once they leave?
i'll miss people believing absurdity so honestly it becomes funny, but i guess you win some you lose some its a hard life sometimes being perfect *sigh* but i guess i just have to keep on going. poor me.
(just playing!! i'll miss you guys!! *tear* )
You used big words and spelt "call" wrong.
Tue Jun 15, 2004 9:20 am
Redbulls wrote:The Lakers have never been a fastbreak team during the Shaq and Kobe era and it's not about to change in 3 games or so.
crawford4MIP4real wrote:the lakers can't fastbreak because the pistons are controlling the boards. besides, the pistons are more athletic, mobile, and longer at each position then LAL except SG
logically speaking, you run the system around your superstars abilities, then play the role players (payton) that fit the system. why should phil jackson abandon the offense which produced 9 championships for the 4th "best" scorer on the team? what can payton do now anyway? he can't post up effectively on billups and you have rasheed wallace playing zone defense now. i'd much rather have fisher camping around the 3pt land and flopping on defense then contine to have payton make billups look like the finals mvp.
Tue Jun 15, 2004 10:25 am
gloveGuy wrote:The Lakers can fastbreak. All they need to do is prevent the offensive rebounds -- which they can do.
gloveGuy wrote:Phil would/should abandon the offense for the better of the team. They're simply a better, more dominating team when they run the break. Now you ask, what can Payton do? Well, he can run the fast break. He can run it very well.
gloveGuy wrote:And about Payton getting dominated by Billups. I'd hardly say that's true. The Lakers are getting dominated by Billups. As we all know, defending the pick-and-roll is a team job. Maybe if Shaq would step out a bit, Billups wouldn't statistically have a large advantage over Payton
Tue Jun 15, 2004 10:48 am
if your original intention was to have phil drop the triangle offense for the better of the team, you should have said so in the first place and not say "he should play an offense more to Payton's strengths"
but i think you would agree one of the main principles of the triple post is to get all of the players involved. the triangle is for the better for the teams since it does play to strengths of role players not counting GP. most of them are spot up shooters who can't create shots for themselves
he is getting dominated by Billups. who is the one is that is getting fined by the nba for not speaking to the media because he's frustrated? why is else is payton not playing a lot more minutes, especially in crunchtime? why is fisher getting more minutes? why is bryant the one guarding billups in the end?
Tue Jun 15, 2004 11:09 am
Psycho Jackal wrote:
True that, Big Ben can't contain Shaq...given he can't contain him, can anyone tell me why he doesnt get the ball on every possesion?![]()
Tue Jun 15, 2004 12:32 pm