jettdaking! wrote:i'm a bulls fan, but even with Gordon, i think Chicago's going nowhere next season
air gordon wrote:i think its spin control by Reinsdorf. he didn't really answer some of the questions lol.
Andrew wrote:air gordon wrote:i think its spin control by Reinsdorf. he didn't really answer some of the questions lol.
Can't put it any better than that. Those answers contained so much rubbish and drivel you'd think he was running for office.
But "organisations win championships", right? Funny, there hasn't been any banners since Jordan and Pippen left the building.
But one well-placed insider volunteered this tip when it comes to Lee's situation: "Keep your eye on Chicago."
Andrew wrote:Doesn't look like much is happening on the Boozer front, but apparently David Lee's name has entered the mix with a possible sign-and-trade to the Bulls..
Lamrock wrote:Valor, Hinrich is mediocre, and was about to be traded for Steve Blake and Travis Outlaw. Brad Miller is old, and while good, is worse than Lee in nearly every area except passing and overrated intangibles. John Salmons is pretty good, but is one of those guys that has been called underrated so many times that he has inadvertently become overrated. And David Lee is younger and far better. Obviously Derrick Rose wouldn't be put into such a trade, though Lee was more valuable this year.
The X wrote:Honestly if the Bulls get Lee, they become very likeable for a fan like me that isn't aligned to any one team. I'd probably keep Tyrus Thomas as I'd like to see both of them on court together. If they did get Lee, get rid of pothead guy Noah.
Valor wrote:i'd be happy with Lee if it doesn't take Rose, Hinrich, Salmons or Miller to get him in that sign-and-trade
Lamrock wrote:PER and win shares, both of which overwhelmingly favor Lee.
air gordon wrote:could Lee really be a 20ppg.. on the bulls?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests