13 vs 81

[_Steve_]

agree on that Andrew, the 3 point distance in the NBA was far than FIBA that's why it was too easy to shoot for Durant

Very far?

NBA: 23 feet 9 inches (7.24 m)
FIBA: 22.1 ft (6.75 m)

It's not THAT huge of a difference.

[The X]

T-Mav's 13 was very impressive, but a bit hard to get too impressed when the game stops & starts constantly & 35 seconds lasts for 10 minutes. I think the most impressive thing about that end of game was the Spurs didn't choke on their free throws, they were making nearly all of them, but T-Mac kept hitting.

I agree Andrew that there are other statistical feats that I find more impressive than Kobe's 81. Quadruple doubles are great. I liked Love's 30/30 as well But hey, it's all personal perspective.

[shadowgrin]

[why you're always like that? We are talking about Kobe and T-Mac, there is no Miller don't be a bitter, you're always like that

I'm not. Maybe you are for limiting and giving away inferior options. Give me a reason why only those two you gave are worthy of a mention or discussion and not others?

[Jhiane]

lol obviously you are if you don't like my inferior options, you are free to make your own thread entitled "Which is better, Miller, Kobe or T-Mac's?"

[shadowgrin]

Redundant.

[Sideshow Bob]

Bitches please.

phpBB [video]

TRUUUUU....

[Jhiane]

redundant your self

[shadowgrin]

[Jhiane]

whatever bitter

[shadowgrin]

[Jhiane]

oh i never thought ampalaya is your favorite

[Andrew]

NBA: 23 feet 9 inches (7.24 m)
FIBA: 22.1 ft (6.75 m)

It's not THAT huge of a difference.

It's not like it's a difference of ten feet or anything, but it's still about half a metre, making it around two steps closer. That's still a significant difference.

[_Steve_]

NBA: 23 feet 9 inches (7.24 m)
FIBA: 22.1 ft (6.75 m)

It's not THAT huge of a difference.

It's not like it's a difference of ten feet or anything, but it's still about half a metre, making it around two steps closer. That's still a significant difference.

Well I know, half a metre closer to the basket means a lot. This is something the NBA experienced when experimenting with 3 point range. It's just when some of the guys talk about the range difference it sounds like 30 feet to 15 feet difference.
Actually FIBA three point range is even closer to NBA standards than NCAA three point range at 20 feet 9 inches (6.32 m)...

[Murat]

Kobe - Scored 81 against a weak Toronto Raptors.

Tracy - Scored 13 in 35 secs against a powerful San Antonio Spurs.

[Sauru]

i agree with shadow, my vote goes to miller

[NovU]

Agreed. I watched that game LIVE and I remember how that moment gave me a chill.

[Jhiane]

maybe I forgot this shadowgrin, before saying my options was inferior, just remember the 100 points of chamberlain obviously is better than your Kobe and Miller. Im just asking about T Mac and Kobe. If you're disagree and don't like it you better out

[Murat]

Reggie Miller is better. Today in NBA, no one can repeat this performance. Even they can't repeat against Bobcats. BOBCATS!

the basketball was way better in 90's.

[shadowgrin]

A lot of thought was certainly put into that 3 week delayed important response. Good for you.

[Jhiane]

good for you also