Sat May 19, 2012 12:53 pm
Sat May 19, 2012 8:06 pm
Sun May 20, 2012 1:55 am
Tue May 22, 2012 11:06 am
Thu May 24, 2012 3:47 pm
Thu May 24, 2012 9:07 pm
Fri May 25, 2012 2:31 am
shadowgrin wrote:I like AI but that's a terrible idea for the Sixers to even consider.
Fri May 25, 2012 6:28 pm
Fri May 25, 2012 7:17 pm
Fri May 25, 2012 11:14 pm
Sat May 26, 2012 1:56 am
shadowgrin wrote:I wouldn't mind that Gasol for Iggy trade rumor.
NovU wrote:Perhaps we can have a nice lil chat on the Heat vs 76ers thread next week
Sat May 26, 2012 3:00 am
Spree#8 wrote:shadowgrin wrote:I wouldn't mind that Gasol for Iggy trade rumor.
Please tell me you're kidding. Why would the Sixers do it?
Sat May 26, 2012 4:00 am
Sun May 27, 2012 11:23 am
Sun May 27, 2012 12:35 pm
Sun May 27, 2012 12:38 pm
Sun May 27, 2012 12:45 pm
Sun May 27, 2012 2:37 pm
Spree#8 wrote:Gasol gets you points from the post, but he's not all that consistent. One game he's a beast, next game he's passive and takes 7-8 shots in 40 minutes. Not to mention he's 32 years old, so he's only gonna get worse.
Gasol is actually a very solid rebounder. But again, not a long-term solution.
Mind you, we would have to send someone else to the Lakers since salaries don't match.
I've heard something about Josh Smith wanting out of Atlanta, I'd much rather see him in a Sixers jersey than Gasol (I mean, if we don't let him brick long 2s all night like he does in Atlanta and use him more wisely on offense)
Sun May 27, 2012 5:55 pm
Sun May 27, 2012 7:57 pm
Sun May 27, 2012 8:57 pm
Mon May 28, 2012 12:38 am
Mon May 28, 2012 1:05 am
shadowgrin wrote:You wouldn't be consistent too if you're not comfortable with your role in the offense.
Pau has already said that earlier in the season he doesn't want to be too much in the high post reduced to shooting mid-range jumpers or the way Mike Brown is using him. Despite being out of his comfort zone in the offense he still managed to be efficient and get the offense going aka 'passing it to Kobe'.
shadowgrin wrote:Gasol is definitely not a long term solution. Just to fill a hole, a very important hole, until Vucevic or Lavoy improves and then let Gasol go when his contract runs out in the next two years.
shadowgrin wrote:http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachi ... Id=7sxopeq
shadowgrin wrote:NO. Just no. Sixers offense is about shooting mid-range shots (league-leading!?). Having that kind of offense would only give Smith the permission to shoot those bricks.
shadowgrin wrote:The good thing in the Sixers losing that game 7 is that hopefully it gave Rondo confidence to his outside shot and make some more against the Heat.
Mon May 28, 2012 9:39 pm
Spree#8 wrote:People have been calling him soft and inconsistent for a good few years.
Spree#8 wrote:Turner is about taking it to the basket, he has no 3 point range and his mid-range shot comes and goes, perhaps he can become a good post player, but not ready to be a first or second option yet. Jrue is very hard to stop when he drives, but rarely does so - he shoots threes instead. And he is a sharpshooter, but often not a powerful enough scorer. Therefore Gasol would have to carry the load on offense most of the time
Spree#8 wrote:we all know how that turned out in Memphis. 0 playoff games won in 12 tries.
Spree#8 wrote:Of course it's a very important hole. But why can't we fill it using Brand's contract and/or picks and/or Lou's or Hawes' sign-and-trade instead of getting rid of our best (here and now) player for someone who's not really worth it?
Spree#8 wrote:Then perhaps we shouldn't rely on mid-range jumpshots anymore?... oh wait, if we trade Iggy for Gasol, I guess we start Thad at the 3. He made 1 three-point shot this season, so we end up with a grand total of 1 player in our s5 with 3-point range (Jrue), which means if we try to go inside we'll get clusterfucked by the opposing defense because there's nobody waiting outside who could punish them. And we have to shoot from mid-range... or we can always go back to starting Meeks and playing him 30 minutes because we desperately need someone to help with the spacing. Sounds good? yeah, thought so.shadowgrin wrote:NO. Just no. Sixers offense is about shooting mid-range shots (league-leading!?). Having that kind of offense would only give Smith the permission to shoot those bricks.
Spree#8 wrote:Best wishes for the Celtics in the ECF, but they have no stoppers for Wade and James
Spree#8 wrote:Philly might have actually been a more difficult matchup for the Heat
Tue May 29, 2012 12:41 am
shadowgrin wrote:Well, if he was given a better team instead with the likes of James Posey, Bonzi Wells, Stromile Swift, Jason Williams, Earl Watson, Mike Miller, and Chucky Atkins then he could have won one game during those playoffs with the Grizzlies.
shadowgrin wrote:If you want to see real soft look at Lamar Odom.
shadowgrin wrote:Gasol being a better offensive player than Iguodala is better suited to carry the offense without Lou Williams.
shadowgrin wrote:I think Gasol is worth it else we wouldn't be even having this discussion now.
shadowgrin wrote:Sign and trade is out of the question with the new CBA. Sixers have to wait six months before they can trade Lou or Hawes if Sixers sign them. What's the point of keeping them until December next season if the Sixers don't want them anyway by willing to trade them and if no team wants them then the Sixers would be burdened with their huge salary if they do manage to get one.
shadowgrin wrote:If you don't want the team to shoot mid-range jumpshots fire Collins then, it's his system. I'm not opposed to Collins' system, I'm opposed in bringing in a player who's known to brick, a lot, the type of shots that are available in such a system. Even Gasol is a better mid-range shooter than Josh Smith.
Collins did a good job of recognizing that the team doesn't have a consistent low post option and three-point shooter so his system ended up a lot of mid-range shots being taken. Having Smith instead of Gasol won't address what the team lacks but would even make it worse since Smith loves very much to brick those long two's.
shadowgrin wrote:Which teams do?
shadowgrin wrote:A team that takes most of its shots from the mid-range against a team that's good in defending that area of the court who also have two of the best players in the league. Ok then.
shadowgrin wrote:It's not like the Sixers have a deep bench or a good scoring team like the Pacers or Mavs had. Granted that the Sixers do have a great defense, so do the Heat.