Fri Mar 21, 2003 9:49 am
Michael wrote:he was the best point guard of the 1990's and 3rd best guard overall behind michael jordan and clyde drexler
Fri Mar 21, 2003 12:56 pm
Is really difficult not to include Richmond before Hardaway as a top guard
what, for catching the ball after 3 screens and shooting open 3's for a career? i don't think soWith GS he was almost every year injured
where do u get this shit from? he averaged 74 games per season at golden stateSpecially if you call those Warriors, Mullin & Richmond were there, 3 players averaging 20+ ppg something you don't see today and would guarantee you at least a trip to the Finals conference, he couldn't guide that team anywhere.
Fri Mar 21, 2003 3:50 pm
Fri Mar 21, 2003 9:11 pm
Fri Mar 21, 2003 11:28 pm
Fri Mar 21, 2003 11:48 pm
his shooting wau no doupt the best in the 90's
clir mulling
Sat Mar 22, 2003 9:58 am
Michael wrote:However he was good enough to be 3rd best shooting guard of the 1990's
Michael wrote:what, for catching the ball after 3 screens and shooting open 3's for a career? i don't think so
Michael wrote:where do u get this shit from? he averaged 74 games per season at golden state
Michael wrote:2. who did the golden state have besides the big 3? fukn marciulionis?
Michael wrote:2. who did the golden state have besides the big 3? fukn marciulionis?
Sat Mar 22, 2003 1:16 pm
Michael wrote:
Michael wrote:
However he was good enough to be 3rd best shooting guard of the 1990's
No, he was the 3rd best guard, if you are ranking MJ & Drexler 1st & 2nd, then 3rd & 4th would belong to Reggie and Mitch
for taking his team every year to the conf. finals
That's where I got mine, where did you get yours?
Wasn't Marciulionis an all-star in GS?.
Besides Mullin & Marciulionis Tim had (B. Owens, R. Higgins, C. Gattling, Tyrone Hill, Super Mario Elie).
Another year He had (Spree, Owens, V. Alexander, Gattling & T. Hill) Besides Mullin & Marciulionis
following his injury he had (Spree, Gattling, Guggliotta, R. Pierce, R. Seikaly, V. Alexander) Besides Mullin
Sat Mar 22, 2003 1:37 pm
In the first quote thing [quote] put [quote="who you want it to say"] For example to put michael, type [quote="michael"] that's what I did above.michael wrote:first i'll ask how do you guys put a name where it says quote for me
Sat Mar 22, 2003 1:41 pm
colin wrote:that's what I did above.
Sat Mar 22, 2003 1:42 pm
Sat Mar 22, 2003 1:48 pm
Sat Mar 22, 2003 11:27 pm
Michael wrote:what your info says to me is that hardaway was basically majorly injured only 1 season and besides this one season he is consistant
Michael wrote:if he was he shouldn't have been.
Michael wrote:only good players out of them at that time was owens and gatling
Michael wrote:this is spree's rookie season, also the year marciulionis and owens both played 37 games. gatling and hill are nobodies this yr
Michael wrote:gugliotta played 40 games. pierce played 27. seikaly 36. mullin 25
Sat Mar 22, 2003 11:56 pm
scubilete wrote:Gugg played 77 games that year
scubilete wrote:GS record when Tim was out for the full season was (50-32), the only year with winning record since Mitch left that team
Sun Mar 23, 2003 7:32 am
Michael wrote:so how would this have an impact on the warriors?
Michael wrote:wrong again...1992 golden state recorded 55 wins, hardaway/mullin 2 of top 12 players in the NBA that year
Michael wrote:2 reasons why golden state won that many games in 1994 (the year he was injured):
-chris webber ROY
- the emergence of latrell sprewell
Michael wrote:tim hardaway deserves his number to be retired by golden state he was the best point guard of the 1990's and 3rd best guard overall behind michael jordan and clyde drexler
Michael wrote:since when was 4 out of 10 'every year'?
Sun Mar 23, 2003 1:12 pm
scubilete wrote:You are complaining that Hardaway didn't have players on his team or that those were shit of players, so when people brings you fact then you would complain for something else?
scubilete wrote:So that means the reason why GS didn't win so many games when Tim came back was that the ROY went to Washington? cause obviously they still had Spree there
Sun Mar 23, 2003 11:10 pm
Mon Mar 24, 2003 1:25 am
Mon Mar 24, 2003 2:39 am
Mon Mar 24, 2003 4:13 pm
Tue Mar 25, 2003 6:39 am
John Starks was a role player in my opinion, although a pretty good one.
Wed Mar 26, 2003 9:16 pm
mp3 wrote:thats right, starks was a good player for the knicks as was tim hardaway for the warriors but thats it, nothing eles nether won anything and dont deserver there numbers retired. not yet anyway
Thu Mar 27, 2003 9:49 am
Fri Mar 28, 2003 9:13 pm
Fri Mar 28, 2003 9:27 pm