imefimef wrote:@Koberulz so under which definition of ignorant do i fall under?
I've already explained this multiple times. You lack the knowledge of the subject of the greatest players in NBA history. You are therefore ignorant of this. It's really not that hard to work out.
And you still don't deny that you are not homosexual, so i take it as you are.
Firstly, I don't have any reason to deny not being homosexual, because I'm not homosexual, and secondly, even if I were homosexual, exactly what difference would it make?
And yes i have been reading your comments and no you never once said LeBron was the better player.
What exactly are you responding to here?
Plus STFU nobody bookmarks that poor excuse of a twitter account
Why would anyone bookmark a Twitter account? And why is this relevant?
and you have no friends because you are too much of a bore, i literally fell asleep reading your comment that's why it took so long to reply.

Good day troll.
I find it amusing that you level such accusations against me. Trolling is posting with the express purpose of inciting a flame from another poster. Whilst you have certainly been flaming, I fail to see where I've been trolling. Here's a recap of our conversation so far:
You claimed LeBron was top-five all time.
I claimed he was not. I backed up this assertion by listing several players who were better than LeBron.
You said you didn't know enough about the subject to make that claim.
I asked why you made that claim despite lacking the knowledge required to make it (i.e. being ignorant).
You decided to discuss my sexuality, blog, and various online friends lists in rather derogatory terms.
You still haven't answered my question, which is a perfectly legitimate one. That question, as well as everything leading up to it, was perfectly legitimate conversation within the context of this thread. You're the first one who made this about anything more than the LeBron debate. Don't try to pin that on me.
And the 1% of the population who are mindful called, they said they don't want to be friends with you. Infact now the mindful ppl realize that maybe the mindless aren't that bad because they all don't like you so they befriended more mindless and now there's a whole 3% that are now mindful. Thanks, turns out you are semi-useful.
If I knew what you were actually trying to say, I might be offended (though I doubt it, you've not yet managed to offend me with your drivel). Hint: "mindless" and "mindful" are not antonyms.
With that being said, you know absolutely nothing about my life outside of the internet (or even much of my life
on the internet), or how many friends I actually have, or why it's not more than or less than that, so it's really quite easy to brush aside your attempts to insult me because they're way off the mark. You're also pretty juvenile, to be perfectly honest.