Tue Mar 15, 2011 8:30 am
shadowgrin wrote:The same "criticism" can be said about LeBron's FT shooting.
I meant did the LeBron fans jump ship.shadowgrin wrote:No one jumped ship. No one sailed with the ship in the beginning anyway.
shadowgrin wrote:Two things. Those who are willing to discuss such a comparison have either:
1) Made up their own opinion and have such preference for one player or the other, despite stats or no stats. Their personal reason is justification enough. Nothing wrong with that imo, unless one crosses that line of being an annoying fanboi.
imefimef wrote:We all have rights to our opinions and i can't knock you for yours, but i'm not really asking for opinions
shadowgrin wrote:2) This kind of discussion has been done to death in the NLSC, or any basketball forum for that matter.
Especially with the limiting conditions you set forth in your thread. Comparing an 'older' player to a 26 year old freak of nature that hasn't even reached his prime yet? Might as well ask Kobe to jump over a moving truck irl.
It's like you made this thread and set the conditions so that you can stand up high in your soap box and enjoy looking down on others. How's the view up ther btw?
Though if you're lucky, you can force lurkers to actually post with such 'controversial' topics.
shadowgrin wrote:Jordan already had a decent mid-range game early in his career. In college even.
Kobe already had NBA range during his younger days. His problem then (and at times even now) was bad shot selection. Real bad shot selection, because he knew he can shoot that far which leads to some really ugly results (see LAL vs. Uta playoff series).
Tue Mar 15, 2011 8:35 am
Jackal wrote:Lebron James sucks dick, I think Kobe Bryant is the best player to ever play and if you say he isnt you suck the cock too.
Tue Mar 15, 2011 8:52 am
Lest you think that this is one of those stats that puts too much weight on team defense I offer two counters. First, the defensive rating is per 100 possessions, meaning it's pace adjusted. Also, last year Kobe was 4th on his own team, behind Odom, Gasol and Bynum.
Tue Mar 15, 2011 9:31 am
Tue Mar 15, 2011 9:53 am
Our Rules wrote:Avoid double/triple/quadruple (and so on) posting. Use the Edit button to add something to a post that you may have forgotten rather than making several posts in a row. Exceptions include:
- Reviving a discussion in an inactive thread in which you had the last post, such as the daily game discussion threads in NBA Talk.
- Updating a Dynasty thread, within reason. The common practice of reserving the first few posts for updates is allowed. Likewise, you may double post with further updates such as additional game recaps if there have been no responses since your last post.
- Updating a patch announcement thread.
Tue Mar 15, 2011 12:50 pm
imefimef wrote:Kobe gotten 6.9 rebounds once and the next highsest 6.3. Same with assists Lakers have played out the triangle offense and Kobe has never gotten more than 6 assists a game which was once then one 5.9. As far as Kobe's defense from one of those links i posted:
Kobe has never led the league in steals, and only finished in the top 5 twice. He's only finished in the top 10 in Defensive Win Shares once. He's only averaged more than a block a game once in his career. Not only does he not stop the other guy from scoring, he doesn't generate a lot of big plays himself either. I understand the illusion exists that he's a great defensive player, so please don't come telling me how many All Defensive teams he's been on. He doesn't belong on them.
imefimef wrote:Well if someone actually says something worth listening to then why the hell wouldn't I? I mean really you're telling me all the "because he has shark like instincts are supposed to make me change my opinions?
imefimef wrote:What? Micheal Jordan was a HORRIBLE 3 point shooter in his first 5 seasons, he shot from 0.173% to 0.276%. Those are nothing but HORRIBLE numbers, and in the coming seasons he still had bad years in shooting the 3(especially at the end of his career ending with 0.18% and 0.29%. And you honestly are telling me LeBron didn't get better as a shooter since '03? If you honestly believe that then i don't respect any of your opinions because that literally makes no sense.
imefimef wrote:And if you're too stupid to get that i'm joking by calling you Charlie Sheen and you believe i think you really are Charlie Sheen then yeah, turn off the computer and put on your helmet.
imefimef wrote:Oscar Robertson played in a different time, they actually adjusted his stats to today's game and it doesn't come up to a triple double, the pace was much more different and i remember LeBron's stats were adjust to that pace and it actually came out to more than a triple double over a season. Hedo, Andre, Pippen and Magic never scored 30per. The only 3 players to ever get 30 points a game, over 7 rebounds and 7 assists are The big O (but i already explained about the pace thing), Micheal Jordan (You prolly heard about him before) and oh this dude called LeBron. Only rookies to get 20+ ppg game 5 rebs and 5 asts? Big O, MJ and LeBron.
Tue Mar 15, 2011 1:22 pm
Fact, my sarcasm detector has exploded a long time ago.imefimef wrote:shadowgrin wrote:The same "criticism" can be said about LeBron's FT shooting.
Are you special? That was the point i was trying to make was you can't say one player is more dedicated than the other, didn't you at least detect the hint of sarcasm in my text? In an argument were i say "you can't say one is more dedicated" than another i end it with "Obviously LeBron is dedicated than he is". Yeesh.
Then what the hell is the point of this 'factual' thread anyway?It would be stupid to argue about the past because, well, it's the past. The present on the other hand is now and that's what I am talking about, LeBron James is by far playing the best basketball right now and is the best player right now. Period. A fact, not an argument. If it is that i'm just a crazy person then i ask please give me reasons why it's Kobe and i hear shit like he has Shark blood, please GTFOH. That's not saying Kobe isn't good, but that LeBron is better. Not a diss to Kobe but a compliment to LeBron.
No. I said that to inform others who might be confused with what you just said about Jordan and Kobe regarding their shot early career. The same thing you are doing right now regarding facts about LeBron.shadowgrin wrote:So you're ssaying we should discredit LeBron for having good shot selection there by taking shots he's better at which is attacking the basket? Yes that makes sense and about Jordan see my previous comment about Jordan's jumpshot. And even if so what? Kobe has a better jumpshot? SO! WHAT! I've said that myself multiple times, but is that reason enough why Kobe is better?
Devin Harris has a much better jumpshot than Rondo, and he takes more difficult shots than Rondo and makes more than Rondo and shoots better for freethrows, therefore he's better than Rondo. YES. That makes all the sense in the world.
Tue Mar 15, 2011 1:33 pm
shadowgrin wrote:Maybe I should make a thread: 'The earth spins around the sun!' and wait for people to give me new 'facts' that say otherwise?
Tue Mar 15, 2011 1:36 pm
shadowgrin wrote:Maybe I should make a thread: 'The earth spins around the sun!' and wait for people to give me new 'facts' that say otherwise?
Tue Mar 15, 2011 3:09 pm
imefimef wrote: Hedo, Andre, Pippen and Magic never scored 30per
Tue Mar 15, 2011 11:25 pm
imefimef wrote:jenroe962002 wrote:Because Kobe can nail that so they can't question that.
as i read in some book it goes like this:
Michael Jordan: Winning
Kobe Bryant: Greatness
LeBron James: Amaze
You can't question pulling up from way too deep for 3 when you're down by 4 in the closing moments? Then you are obviously a GENIUS.
And WTF does the last part mean? what does that have to do with anything?
EDIT: You should burn that book because it would be more useful to you as a heat source then for you to read it.
Tue Mar 15, 2011 11:30 pm
imefimef wrote:Ok NONE of those people's stat lines(except Bird) has 30ppg tho? SO really WTF? The highest was 21 points. Plus if you notice, i said Hedo, Andre, Pippen and Magic never scored 30per
imefimef wrote:So you are saying Kobe is a better playmaker or rebounder than LeBron? Plus didn't the Bulls run triangle offense? Then how did Micheal who is also 6'6'' (so don't tell me LeBron is taller) get those rebounds and assists? Don't worry I'll wait.
imefimef wrote:The point is ppl like ur self and Charlie She...no i mean Batman said i don't listen to others and can't change my mind, so i ask for reasonable reason because i don't change my opinions and principle based on a whim such as "a better temperament to go with some mad skill"
Wed Mar 16, 2011 1:37 am
Wed Mar 16, 2011 2:04 am
shadowgrin wrote:Just curious, ignoring rings who would you pick as a better player imefimef, McGrady or Kobe?
Wed Mar 16, 2011 4:55 am
Wed Mar 16, 2011 5:15 am
imefimef wrote:Remeber when Kobe raped that girl?
Wed Mar 16, 2011 7:05 am
imefimef wrote:@jenroe9620002
Yeah i'm not talking to you anymore. LeBrick, yeall creative and mature.
@Batman
No it's not my list, it's an NBA club, the 30 7 and 7 club just like there are 30 30 clubs and such there is a 30 7 and 7 club.
This here is the 30 points and 7 assist club(BECAUSE IT IS DIFFICULT TO SCORE 30 AND GET 7 ASSISTS)
http://www.sportscity.com/nba/nba-30-points-7-assists-club/3056/
See the caliber of players there? Yea LeBron didn't only get that, he got 7 assists along with that. So yeah that's impressive.
Funny how you quoted the part where i said sexcept Bird because he was fucking close and there's nothing wrong with Magic but 30 7 and 7 is way more difficult than 19, 9 and 9.
And the thing about legacy is that YOU CAN'T JUDGE TILL AFTER. Remeber when Kobe raped that girl? people said similar things, remeber when Kobe asked for a trade? was that loyal? but now you never hear anything about it. LeBron's legacy is intact and will keep growing till he's done.
If you don't think LeBron will end up as top 5 best players at the end of his career with the way he's going, then you must be the stupidest person alive. At least one of them.
Yeah but MJ got upwards of 5 assists in his prime and what about the rebounds? And what about when Kobe played with Phil Jackson? You have not mention one player except Bird that did what LeBron did and it's not like Bird is a bad player to be compared to.
What legit facts are you mentioning? That Kobe is more skilled therefore a better scorer? I already said that. And because LeBron asked how many rebounds he got he therfore a stat stuffer? Yes that is absolutely more than reason enough and is a fact. LeBron's jumper isn't where it is "supposed to be"? Where the fuck is it supposed to be? WHere the fuck is anybodies jumpshot supposed to be? And if it isn't, yet shoots a better for 3s than Kobe, then where is Kobe's shot supposed to be?
As far as just jumpshots (no close,dunk, tips or inside shots) Kobe this season has 15.3 points with those and has an eFG5 of 0.469.
LeBron has 12 points and a 457 eFG%. How is that bad? So how can one of them be a great shooter and the other a bad shooter? Neither of those numbers are great or bad, those are good numbers. Period.
"savyness, and finishing ability(without the use of "freakish athleticism) as a guard" is not reason enough sir. And you're saying Kobe wasn't atheletic back then? Jumping over every body? And you say my NBA info is ignorant. SMH.
Trying to make yourself feel smarter by not responding, yeah sure run away Charlie Shee...oops i mean Batman.
Ok let's end this thread in one sentence why is Kobe a better basketball player right now?
Wed Mar 16, 2011 7:38 am
imefimef wrote:30 7 and 7 is way more difficult than 19, 9 and 9.
If you don't think LeBron will end up as top 5 best players at the end of his career with the way he's going, then you must be the stupidest person alive. At least one of them.
Thu Mar 17, 2011 4:04 am
Jackal wrote:By the way, I think it's unfair to say "look at what LA did and surrounded Kobe with all stars whereas they got shit for Lebron".
Who the fuck wants to play in Cleveland?![]()
x-uNdErRaTeD-z wrote:
I think LeBron James is currently a better basketball player than Kobe because although he isn't as good a scorer, he more than makes up for it being a more efficient scorer, better rebounder, playmamker, and better OFF-BALL DEFENDER. (As far as on-ball there is no way to quantify them and Kobe who can lock players down doesn't do it day in and day out, so can't be judged off isolated incidents, so i'm not going to comment on that.) LeBron can literally do everything on the court and is above average in every single aspect of the game except socring in the post(which he doesn't do that often). Sure he has weakness especially in freethrow shooting, but you can only hope he'd get better at it because his percentage increases per season. His jumpshot isn't great but it definitely is not bad, a little above average infact and is pretty similar to Kobe's which is definitely not bad. The fact that he was by himself on the Cavs is irrelevant because Kobe has played pretty much by himself for a number of seasons. You wouldn't discredit what Derick Rose did in the playoffs against the Celtics a couple of seasons ago because he was the focal point on his team and was putting up numbers. Kobe was the only one on his team when he scored 81 but that rarely comes up in discussions. Bottom line, LeBron is playing the best basketball in the NBA right now and the past couple of seasons ergo the best player right now.
Thu Mar 17, 2011 5:16 am
Thu Mar 17, 2011 7:08 am
Jackal wrote:
Lebron James is the more talented player, he's easily the best player in the league right now. That doesn't change the fact he's a cocksucker though.
Thu Mar 17, 2011 7:21 am
Jackal wrote:Did I compare their success? Not really.
Lebron James is the more talented player, he's easily the best player in the league right now. That doesn't change the fact he's a cocksucker though.
The point of the whole thing is that you're trying to "have a discussion" but seeking only conflicting opinions so you can rant about it so you can feel good about being right?
"Sun vs Moon.
The sun gives more warmth, but there are guys that say the moon does. Can anyone present me stats or prove to me that the moon provides more warmth?
Person X: Well, the moon looks pretty awesome at night, it makes me wet.
You: Awesome, pretty and wet are all words just thrown out there, point is the sun is warmer. So I'm right, can anyone prove to me I'm not?"
Thu Mar 17, 2011 7:32 am
Thu Mar 17, 2011 8:00 am
Thu Mar 17, 2011 8:23 am