COMPARE this decade rosters to the old rosters

Your source for basketball video games.

Main Site | Forum | Rules | Downloads | Wiki | Features | Podcast

NLSC Forum

Like real basketball, as well as basketball video games? Talk about the NBA, NCAA, and other professional and amateur basketball leagues here.
Post a reply
 
madridken
  • madridken
  • Posts: 28
  • Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 9:31 am

COMPARE this decade rosters to the old rosters

Tue Jul 21, 2009 7:37 am

lets compare teams like 2010 lakers to the 1998 bulls or celtics 2008 to da 85' celtics

Heres Mine:

Lakers 2010 Bulls 1998

Kobe Bryant Michael Jordan
Pau Gasol Luc Longley
Ron Artest Scottie Pippen( yeah i no :D )
Derek Fisher Ron Harper
Lamar Odom(hopefully he stays) Dennis Rodman(yes for me lamar is like a rodman cuz lamar rebounds more than artest)
 
FiZzO
  • FiZzO
  • Posts: 293
  • Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 7:27 am
  • Location: Latvia

Re: COMPARE this decade rosters to the old rosters

Tue Jul 21, 2009 7:43 am

Simply typing players' names next to each other is not really a comparison
 
madridken
  • madridken
  • Posts: 28
  • Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 9:31 am

Re: COMPARE this decade rosters to the old rosters

Tue Jul 21, 2009 7:57 am

yeah i jus noticed dat :shock:
 
bee-boy
  • bee-boy
  • Posts: 1473
  • Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 7:52 am

Re: COMPARE this decade rosters to the old rosters

Tue Jul 21, 2009 8:13 am

why do you wanna compare. is there something to prove?
 
Lamrock
  • Lamrock
  • Posts: 10936
  • Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 4:02 pm
  • Location: Washington State

Re: COMPARE this decade rosters to the old rosters

Tue Jul 21, 2009 8:19 am

dis thred iz wak dawg
 
Stress Fracture

Re: COMPARE this decade rosters to the old rosters

Tue Jul 21, 2009 8:57 am

:eh: :eh:
 
Its_asdf
  • Its_asdf
  • Posts: 5462
  • Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 4:53 am
  • Location: Under a Rock in Canada

Re: COMPARE this decade rosters to the old rosters

Tue Jul 21, 2009 9:09 am

The Lamar to Rodman comparison is pretty ridiculous. I'd think a Kukoc comparison would be a lot more reasonable.
 
Moz
  • Moz
  • Posts: 1332
  • Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 8:00 pm
  • Location: Superunknown

Re: COMPARE this decade rosters to the old rosters

Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:05 am

Blasphemy :!:
 
Andrew
  • Andrew
  • Posts: 115122
  • Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
  • Location: Australia
  • Website

Re: COMPARE this decade rosters to the old rosters

Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:19 am

Much as I like old Luc, comparing him to Gasol is pretty insulting towards Gasol.
 
Valor
  • Valor
  • Posts: 4971
  • Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 2:23 am
  • Location: New Zealand

Re: COMPARE this decade rosters to the old rosters

Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:35 am

Its_asdf wrote:The Lamar to Rodman comparison is pretty ridiculous. I'd think a Kukoc comparison would be a lot more reasonable.

agreed, Rodman can't play 5 positions like Odom and he's not gifted offensively (minus the 3 straight treys and the occasion mid range jumper that goes in), while Odom isn't exactly a rebounding freak that can lead the league in rebounding for 7 straight years, or make the all defensive teams...Kukoc is a much more realistic comparison when it comes to my man LO

Andrew wrote:Much as I like old Luc, comparing him to Gasol is pretty insulting towards Gasol.

my view exactly...
 
J@3
  • J@3
  • Posts: 19815
  • Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 3:25 pm
  • Location: MLB
  • Website

Re: COMPARE this decade rosters to the old rosters

Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:37 am

madridken wrote:( yeah i no :D )


Somehow I doubt that.
 
Lean
  • Lean
  • Posts: 7775
  • Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 8:49 pm
  • Location: Pilipinas
  • Website

Re: COMPARE this decade rosters to the old rosters

Tue Jul 21, 2009 11:07 am

He might just want us to think that the '10 Lakers will be like the '98 Bulls. :|
 
Valor
  • Valor
  • Posts: 4971
  • Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 2:23 am
  • Location: New Zealand

Re: COMPARE this decade rosters to the old rosters

Tue Jul 21, 2009 11:09 am

Lean wrote:He might just want us to think that the '10 Lakers will be like the '98 Bulls. :|

he's not doing a very good job at it :lol:
 
Moz
  • Moz
  • Posts: 1332
  • Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 8:00 pm
  • Location: Superunknown

Re: COMPARE this decade rosters to the old rosters

Tue Jul 21, 2009 12:23 pm

They're more comparable to the '92 Blazers than to that of the '98 Bulls I reckon...
 
Modifly
  • Modifly
  • Posts: 4077
  • Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:04 pm
  • Location: Thailand
  • Website

Re: COMPARE this decade rosters to the old rosters

Tue Jul 21, 2009 12:44 pm

I would compare the '10 Lakers to the '04 Lakers. :lol:
 
bee-boy
  • bee-boy
  • Posts: 1473
  • Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 7:52 am

Re: COMPARE this decade rosters to the old rosters

Tue Jul 21, 2009 1:35 pm

i wouldn't compare the '10 lakers to any team.
 
Modifly
  • Modifly
  • Posts: 4077
  • Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:04 pm
  • Location: Thailand
  • Website

Re: COMPARE this decade rosters to the old rosters

Tue Jul 21, 2009 1:38 pm

Why? Because they're so unique and fantastic or is it because each teams are different and are unique in its own way?
 
bee-boy
  • bee-boy
  • Posts: 1473
  • Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 7:52 am

Re: COMPARE this decade rosters to the old rosters

Tue Jul 21, 2009 1:44 pm

no because they haven't proven anything yet.
 
Modifly
  • Modifly
  • Posts: 4077
  • Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:04 pm
  • Location: Thailand
  • Website

Re: COMPARE this decade rosters to the old rosters

Tue Jul 21, 2009 1:46 pm

True. Great answer. (Y)
 
Andrew
  • Andrew
  • Posts: 115122
  • Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
  • Location: Australia
  • Website

Re: COMPARE this decade rosters to the old rosters

Thu Jul 23, 2009 11:17 am

But in that respect, I'd compare them to the 2010 Boston Celtics. They haven't proven anything yet either.
 
Fresh8
  • Fresh8
  • Posts: 14872
  • Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:19 pm

Re: COMPARE this decade rosters to the old rosters

Thu Jul 23, 2009 1:20 pm

Then would you go on to compare to them to all the teams in the league because no one has proven anything for 2010?
 
Modifly
  • Modifly
  • Posts: 4077
  • Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:04 pm
  • Location: Thailand
  • Website

Re: COMPARE this decade rosters to the old rosters

Thu Jul 23, 2009 1:28 pm

But we know for a fact that some teams will definitely suck while some teams definitely wont. Eventhough no one has proven anything for 2010 we're capable of making a fair prediction on how they will perform. ;)
Last edited by Modifly on Thu Jul 23, 2009 3:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
Andrew
  • Andrew
  • Posts: 115122
  • Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
  • Location: Australia
  • Website

Re: COMPARE this decade rosters to the old rosters

Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:58 pm

Sit wrote:Then would you go on to compare to them to all the teams in the league because no one has proven anything for 2010?


Pretty much. :) Though you could obviously narrow the comparisons down to teams of similar strength that have made noteworthy offseason acquisitions.
 
Laxation
  • Laxation
  • Posts: 4400
  • Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 11:28 pm
  • Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: COMPARE this decade rosters to the old rosters

Thu Jul 23, 2009 3:22 pm

So this thead doesnt get locked, but a couple of perfectly good ones in General Talk do?

Horseshit...
 
Andrew
  • Andrew
  • Posts: 115122
  • Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
  • Location: Australia
  • Website

Re: COMPARE this decade rosters to the old rosters

Thu Jul 23, 2009 3:29 pm

If you've got concerns about that, you're free to take it up with Jae.
Post a reply
Switch to full style

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.

phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.

Board index