All-Defensive Teams announced.

So tell me what the be all and end all of the discussion should be.

Nice post deletion again Benji

It was redundant to Kaboom's post. It basically asked if it was so absurd, why do you refuse to do the simple work to counter the apparently absurd claim? And Kaboom is asking a connected question of what the end all should be. I would of course assume they are very much connected considering the "end all" response would explain your reasons for Garnett being superior to Farmar.

Considering you read it, I'm still led to assume you must not be able to.

I read it, but I deleted my response

Actually I didn't, I gave the reasons in one of my previous posts. For those that can't read:

Because it's the most absurd thing I've ever heard in my life. If a retard calls me dumb do you think I'd stand there arguing with him or I'd laugh at the comment and keep walking? This is the same thing, I couldn't care less. If someone on here says "Shaq is a better shooter then Glen Rice in his prime" do you expect a 1500 word response proving him wrong or people to just look at it and laugh?

"Hiii I'm good at debates "

If something is absurd, you shouldn't need even 100 words to show why.

I guess I, and everyone else, will just have to be convinced you have no ability to show why.

Does this mean I failed my class? Damnit! Looks like Summer school for me

How do you know for certain that stats aren't the best way to determine the all-defensive team if you can't think of a better method?

You've effectively proven my point by now. You do have no interest in actually discussing anything.

You refuse to explain why Jordan Farmar isn't superior to Kevin Garnett, despite your claim that it is apparently obvious that the claim is absurd.

You refuse to describe how you would choose All-Defensive Players outside of "I would pick the people I think are best."

You criticize the methods proposed, while refusing to posit your own.

And you focus endlessly on the people making the claims, inbetween sarcasm overloads, instead of the claims and arguments themselves.

Would you actually care to describe how you would choose All-Defense, or try to discredit the apparently absurd but still unchallenged claim that Jordan Farmar is superior defensively to Kevin Garnett?

Because you're not worthy of my opinion. Sorry.