Thu Feb 21, 2013 12:52 pm
Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:03 pm
Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:30 pm
Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:30 pm
Thu Feb 21, 2013 9:39 pm
Thu Feb 21, 2013 10:16 pm
Thu Feb 21, 2013 11:26 pm
Stress Fracture wrote:If Robinson shows his full potential in his stint, I'll be really glad. Patterson and Morris has been playing spectacular this season, proving they're worth the 14th overall picks in '10 and '11.
Thu Feb 21, 2013 11:34 pm
Fri Feb 22, 2013 6:42 am
Patterson broke out this year as a scorer, scoring 11 points in 25 minutes per game, and doing so at just short of 52 percent shooting with a mostly face-up game. He has occasional three-point range and a fantastic mid-range jumper — it’s not hard to project those two things being the inverse of each other some day soon, as that is the way the jump-shooting big man tends to go. Channing Frye was in a similar situation once. Patterson scores, and scores efficiently, without needing much of the playbook to do so. For this reason, he projects as a useful role player for several years. However, Sacramento’s unimpressive recent record on player development isn’t the place for someone with such big holes in his game. Patterson doesn’t box out, doesn’t defend any position, and isn’t tough enough to rectify those problems. He’ll make some jumpers, some fast break dunks, and occasionally carry the team for a quarter, but there’s an awful lot to do.
This trade is essentially Robinson for Patterson, or, more accurately, Robinson for Patterson and cash. Despite in the process of being sold to owners who ostensibly won’t need to do so, the Kings continue to cut costs, costing themselves high draft picks in the process. Trading for Patrick Patterson saves them half a million dollars next season, plus the cost of Robinson’s final two seasons (both of which are option years anyway), while landing them a player that is essentially a simple upgrade to the remnants of Travis Outlaw. And yet if it hadn’t been for Outlaw’s unnecessarily and fully guaranteed four-year, $12 million contract hanging on the books, that money wouldn’t have needed saving anyway. They could have had Lillard or Andre Drummond — instead, they have two Travis Outlaws and two extra 10th men they won’t re-sign.
Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:05 am
The X wrote:Last time I recall a team giving up so early on such a high lottery pick was the Celtics with Joe Johnson. Obviously that turned out poorly for the Celtics.
Fri Feb 22, 2013 8:05 pm
Fri Feb 22, 2013 8:50 pm
The X wrote:Better than what Kings just did.
Sat Feb 23, 2013 5:04 am
benji wrote:The X wrote:Better than what Kings just did.
Clear $8 million and get the best player in the trade?
Sat Feb 23, 2013 11:10 am