Main Site | Forum | Rules | Downloads | Wiki | Features | Podcast

NLSC Forum

Like real basketball, as well as basketball video games? Talk about the NBA, NCAA, and other professional and amateur basketball leagues here.
Topic locked

Re: The age old Question: LeBron vs Kobe.

Sun Mar 20, 2011 2:38 am

I made it because it's my opinion, and if it false oh the fuck well. Remember that whole everybody is entitled to their own opinion speech i gave? yeah it's my opinion but you wouldn't see me arguing about it. I took the word ignorant in context because the way you used it was synonymous with stupid. After i said i didn't know enough on the subject, you reiterated so you admit to being ignorant.
koberulz wrote: Aren't you just adorable.

As true as it is, i don't need to hear that from you, because you obviously like fish sticks.


Plus if you say LeBron is the best then why the fuck are you still here? that's it, convo done. I guess you have nothing else to do with you combined 9 friends. So either answer the new question about if there was no LeBron and Kobe, go to a different thread and troll the shit out of it.

Re: The age old Question: LeBron vs Kobe.

Sun Mar 20, 2011 3:37 am

LeBron is the best!!!!!!!!!!!!1111111 He's fucking GOAT!!!!11111 yea1111111"!1!1"1!1 :bowdown2: :bowdown: :applaud:

Re: The age old Question: LeBron vs Kobe.

Sun Mar 20, 2011 5:01 am

So after you say yo're done and your horrible use of lolcats, you come back for what? I guess Joker hasn't been up to anything lately so you're kinda bored, or you have no life. Or maybe a combination of both????

Re: The age old Question: LeBron vs Kobe.

Sun Mar 20, 2011 7:13 am

imefimef wrote:I made it because it's my opinion, and if it false oh the fuck well. Remember that whole everybody is entitled to their own opinion speech i gave?

Sure, in primary school, everyone is entitled to their opinion.

However, here in the real world, some opinions are more valid than others. Some aren't valid at all. Opinions require support through logic, evidence, or both. Yours has none of these things.

I took the word ignorant in context because the way you used it was synonymous with stupid. After i said i didn't know enough on the subject, you reiterated so you admit to being ignorant.

"Not knowing enough" is the definition of ignorance. "Not knowing enough despite education on the subject" is stupidity. "Not knowing enough due to refusal to look into the issue or listen to the arguments put forth by others" is willful ignorance, which is just as bad as stupidity in many respects.

As true as it is, i don't need to hear that from you, because you obviously like fish sticks.

Amusing. Do you have anything better to do than insinuate that I'm homosexual as though that has any bearing on this debate whatsoever?


Plus if you say LeBron is the best then why the fuck are you still here?

Have you tried reading my posts? Tangents happen, and your comment about LeBron being top-five all-time was wrong. Horribly, horribly wrong.

I guess you have nothing else to do with you combined 9 friends.

Ooh! Burn! Of course, it becomes less impressive when one considers the possibility that I haven't friended on MySpace and/or Twitter everyone I'm friends with offline, and that as such the numbers on my friends lists are irrelevant. But then I already addressed that point by pointing out that there is no point friending me on MySpace, because I haven't touched it in over a year, and there's little point friending me on Twitter if you have an RSS reader or can bookmark.

Further, the notion that one needs billions of friends is, as I see it, rather stupid. I don't have that many offline either, but that's purely because I don't feel the need to validate myself through other people, and thus opt not to put up with the mindlessness of 99% of the population.

So either answer the new question about if there was no LeBron and Kobe, go to a different thread and troll the shit out of it.

Disagreeing with you is not trolling.

Re: The age old Question: LeBron vs Kobe.

Sun Mar 20, 2011 10:07 am

ZanShadow wrote:unusual good question from a Rockets fan. to answer ur q, probably, Mario Chalmers VS Mike D'Antoni. :rimshot:

What's with the rimshot, and your obssession with Chalmers lately?

Re: The age old Question: LeBron vs Kobe.

Sun Mar 20, 2011 10:12 am

Speaking of Chalmers, he just injured himself and got carried off the court. It looks serious since he couldn't get himself up at all. Good thing we got Bibby though.

Re: The age old Question: LeBron vs Kobe.

Sun Mar 20, 2011 11:49 am

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/truehoop/miamiheat/news/story?id=6237967&campaign=rss&source=ESPNHeadlinesLooks like he sprained his knee.
Axel. wrote:If neither Kobe nor LeBron existed, who would be on either side of this debate?

Probably Derrick Rose and Dwight Howard, Kevin Durant and Amar'e Stoudemire, or Carmelo Anthony and Dwyane Wade.

Re: The age old Question: LeBron vs Kobe.

Mon Mar 21, 2011 11:40 am

imefimef wrote:So after you say yo're done and your horrible use of lolcats, you come back for what? I guess Joker hasn't been up to anything lately so you're kinda bored, or you have no life. Or maybe a combination of both????

Image

Re: The age old Question: LeBron vs Kobe.

Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:49 am

@Koberulz so under which definition of ignorant do i fall under? And you still don't deny that you are not homosexual, so i take it as you are. And yes i have been reading your comments and no you never once said LeBron was the better player. Plus STFU nobody bookmarks that poor excuse of a twitter account, and you have no friends because you are too much of a bore, i literally fell asleep reading your comment that's why it took so long to reply. Good day troll. And the 1% of the population who are mindful called, they said they don't want to be friends with you. Infact now the mindful ppl realize that maybe the mindless aren't that bad because they all don't like you so they befriended more mindless and now there's a whole 3% that are now mindful. Thanks, turns out you are semi-useful.

x-uNdErRaTeD-z wrote:
imefimef wrote:So after you say yo're done and your horrible use of lolcats, you come back for what? I guess Joker hasn't been up to anything lately so you're kinda bored, or you have no life. Or maybe a combination of both????

Image


I don't know whether to laugh at your "pathetic-ness" or to be offended because you may just be a bigot.
Last edited by imefimef on Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:24 am, edited 2 times in total.

Re: The age old Question: LeBron vs Kobe.

Wed Mar 23, 2011 2:42 am

Stop fucking double posting asshole.

Re: The age old Question: LeBron vs Kobe.

Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:25 am

Jackal wrote:Stop fucking double posting asshole.

Calm the fuck down, who lit your tampon on fire? I can't find the damn X or delete option when i click edit.

Re: The age old Question: LeBron vs Kobe.

Wed Mar 23, 2011 7:52 am

imefimef wrote:@Koberulz so under which definition of ignorant do i fall under? And you still don't deny that you are not homosexual, so i take it as you are. And yes i have been reading your comments and no you never once said LeBron was the better player. Plus STFU nobody bookmarks that poor excuse of a twitter account, and you have no friends because you are too much of a bore, i literally fell asleep reading your comment that's why it took so long to reply. Good day troll. And the 1% of the population who are mindful called, they said they don't want to be friends with you. Infact now the mindful ppl realize that maybe the mindless aren't that bad because they all don't like you so they befriended more mindless and now there's a whole 3% that are now mindful. Thanks, turns out you are semi-useful


Image

imefimef wrote:I don't know whether to laugh at your "pathetic-ness" or to be offended because you may just be a bigot.


Image

imefimef wrote:troll


Image

PWNAGE!

Re: The age old Question: LeBron vs Kobe.

Wed Mar 23, 2011 10:52 am

imefimef wrote:@Koberulz so under which definition of ignorant do i fall under?

I've already explained this multiple times. You lack the knowledge of the subject of the greatest players in NBA history. You are therefore ignorant of this. It's really not that hard to work out.

And you still don't deny that you are not homosexual, so i take it as you are.

Firstly, I don't have any reason to deny not being homosexual, because I'm not homosexual, and secondly, even if I were homosexual, exactly what difference would it make?

And yes i have been reading your comments and no you never once said LeBron was the better player.

What exactly are you responding to here?

Plus STFU nobody bookmarks that poor excuse of a twitter account

Why would anyone bookmark a Twitter account? And why is this relevant?

and you have no friends because you are too much of a bore, i literally fell asleep reading your comment that's why it took so long to reply.

Image

Good day troll.

I find it amusing that you level such accusations against me. Trolling is posting with the express purpose of inciting a flame from another poster. Whilst you have certainly been flaming, I fail to see where I've been trolling. Here's a recap of our conversation so far:
You claimed LeBron was top-five all time.
I claimed he was not. I backed up this assertion by listing several players who were better than LeBron.
You said you didn't know enough about the subject to make that claim.
I asked why you made that claim despite lacking the knowledge required to make it (i.e. being ignorant).
You decided to discuss my sexuality, blog, and various online friends lists in rather derogatory terms.

You still haven't answered my question, which is a perfectly legitimate one. That question, as well as everything leading up to it, was perfectly legitimate conversation within the context of this thread. You're the first one who made this about anything more than the LeBron debate. Don't try to pin that on me.

And the 1% of the population who are mindful called, they said they don't want to be friends with you. Infact now the mindful ppl realize that maybe the mindless aren't that bad because they all don't like you so they befriended more mindless and now there's a whole 3% that are now mindful. Thanks, turns out you are semi-useful.

If I knew what you were actually trying to say, I might be offended (though I doubt it, you've not yet managed to offend me with your drivel). Hint: "mindless" and "mindful" are not antonyms.

With that being said, you know absolutely nothing about my life outside of the internet (or even much of my life on the internet), or how many friends I actually have, or why it's not more than or less than that, so it's really quite easy to brush aside your attempts to insult me because they're way off the mark. You're also pretty juvenile, to be perfectly honest.
Last edited by koberulz on Wed Mar 23, 2011 12:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Re: The age old Question: LeBron vs Kobe.

Wed Mar 23, 2011 12:37 pm

Great post kobe. Bravo! Now, lets see what Mr.Troll has to say about that. Even though I'm still replying, I've already said LeBron is the best player but he continues to attack me. I have now come into conclusion that he does not read my posts so I have to post pictures for him to comprehend. Sad isn't it.

Re: The age old Question: LeBron vs Kobe.

Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:34 pm

Ok, i said that how many times now? It's my opinion that a kid who is putting up Micheal Jordan type numbers and is only 26 years old will be one of the greatest to ever play, how far fetched of me, i know. A claim is different from opinion, if it was a claim i would make a new thread about it, but if you read my earlier posts you would see i deemed it asinine to predict the future.

I asked you to answer the original question and you said you answered already, but you didn't till:
koberulz wrote:
imefimef wrote:No it hasn't, not by you at least and ok for old times sake, can you answer it one more time?

LeBron. I don't see why I need to, though. I tend not to bother going into threads just to agree with everyone.


koberulz wrote:
imefimef wrote:Plus STFU nobody bookmarks that poor excuse of a twitter account

Why would anyone bookmark a Twitter account?


koberulz wrote:there's little point friending me on Twitter if you have an RSS reader or can bookmark.

You tell me cock sucker.
I call you a troll because one of my favorite actors (Charlie Sheen ofcourse because like me he is winning!!duh!!) uses that word.

koberulz wrote: Hint: "mindless" and "mindful" are not antonyms.

Hint: They are.
mind·less   
[mahynd-lis] Show IPA
–adjective
1.without intelligence; senseless: a mindless creature.
2.unmindful or heedless: mindless of all dangers.


And really how the hell would i know who you are? Apart from the fact that i wouldn't care to, i simply don't know you so would it matter if you were offended or not? If you were or not how would i know? Do you honestly think i give a flying fuck about your opinions? No sir i don't and for that reason i can be juvenile if i choose to. You are somewhere on this large spinning globe and behind a computer screen so why do i have to act mature or any certain way for that matter? Trying to take the "bigger person" route over the internet is comical to me because the internet is such an insignificant part of life to me so i suggest you put some mascara on and lighten up(ha, you see what i did there? lol). I post something about the "Everything i say is false" on your profile and you get your panties in a bunch like some 5th grade princess.

And @Batman, what is actually sad is after you say "Let [this thread] fall to the bottom or be locked" you still comment afterwards and in the same comment you call me immature you post lol cats and use phrases like "PWNAGE!". You sir are a sad sack of sorry shit who needs to hang himself with his computer cables. Shame on your parents for teaching you how to use a computer. Now go pack your lunch for tomorrow, and go to bed it's prolly past your bedtime.

Re: The age old Question: LeBron vs Kobe.

Wed Mar 23, 2011 2:12 pm

Image

Re: The age old Question: LeBron vs Kobe.

Wed Mar 23, 2011 2:30 pm

imefimef wrote:Ok, i said that how many times now? It's my opinion that a kid who is putting up Micheal Jordan type numbers and is only 26 years old will be one of the greatest to ever play, how far fetched of me, i know. A claim is different from opinion, if it was a claim i would make a new thread about it, but if you read my earlier posts you would see i deemed it asinine to predict the future.

To have an opinion that is worth anything, one must be in possession of all the facts one needs to take into consideration in forming that opinion. You are not in possession of those facts, by your own admission, and therefore have no place spouting such ill-formed opinions. I'm also curious as to where LeBron is putting up "Michael Jordan type numbers". Through seven seasons, Jordan has a higher PER, shoots the ball better, has more offensive rebounds, more steals, fewer turnovers, a better offensive rating, more offensive win shares, more win shares, and more win shares/48. He wins several of those categories by a mile.

I asked you to answer the original question and you said you answered already, but you didn't till

I said that question had been answered billions of times. There have been billions of threads on this subject. Why do I, specifically, need to answer it in this thread, specifically?

koberulz wrote:
imefimef wrote:Plus STFU nobody bookmarks that poor excuse of a twitter account

Why would anyone bookmark a Twitter account?


koberulz wrote:there's little point friending me on Twitter if you have an RSS reader or can bookmark.

You tell me cock sucker.

I was talking about bookmarking my web site. Try again.

I call you a troll because one of my favorite actors (Charlie Sheen ofcourse because like me he is winning!!duh!!) uses that word.

:roll:

koberulz wrote: Hint: "mindless" and "mindful" are not antonyms.

Hint: They are.
mind·less   
[mahynd-lis] Show IPA
–adjective
1.without intelligence; senseless: a mindless creature.
2.unmindful or heedless: mindless of all dangers.

Not in the sense you're using them. I think. Of course I'm only assuming that because when replacing those words your rant makes sense, but there could be some other cause for its incoherence.

And really how the hell would i know who you are? Apart from the fact that i wouldn't care to, i simply don't know you

This is the point I'm trying to make.

so would it matter if you were offended or not? If you were or not how would i know?

You certainly seem to be trying very hard to offend me.

Do you honestly think i give a flying fuck about your opinions? No sir i don't

Then why the fuck are you on this forum?

and for that reason i can be juvenile if i choose to. You are somewhere on this large spinning globe and behind a computer screen so why do i have to act mature or any certain way for that matter? Trying to take the "bigger person" route over the internet is comical to me because the internet is such an insignificant part of life to me

Most people give a fuck about that sort of thing. You claim to be the same age I am, yet you post like I did five years ago. Except with worse grammar (and this is keeping in mind that I didn't even use capitals back then).

I post something about the "Everything i say is false" on your profile and you get your panties in a bunch like some 5th grade princess.

No, I take issue with you making claims you lack the knowledge to make, then resorting to personal attacks and other distraction tactics when called out on it instead of providing reasoning for your argument, instead labelling it 'off topic' as though everything else you've posted hasn't been.

Re: The age old Question: LeBron vs Kobe.

Wed Mar 23, 2011 2:31 pm

Hahaha, that's funny, as in this conversation is now a train wreck. See Batman, now thats how you use pictures to get your message across.

Re: The age old Question: LeBron vs Kobe.

Wed Mar 23, 2011 2:36 pm

imefimef wrote:Hahaha, that's funny, as in this conversation is now a train wreck.

Yes, that's what he meant. Aren't you clever?

Re: The age old Question: LeBron vs Kobe.

Wed Mar 23, 2011 2:38 pm

shadowgrin wrote:Image


Yep.
Topic locked