Paul Pierce will win the MVP & other predictions.

Iverson and Pierce will not get less than 2 turnovers a game.

This is how the MVP is right now.......KG 9/10 Tim DUncan 8.5/10

Everyone else, don't even bother.

Then AI and Pierce won't win it, will they(duh)? read the sig.

Right..... Anyways averaging more than 2 t.o doesn't make a player unable to get MVP since Duncan is averaging 2.9 and KG 2.5. A more realistice goal for AI and Pierce is less than 3 t.o's per game, Iverson average 3.34 tpg when he won it in 2000-2001 so it really isn't relevant.

You don't seem to make good points on ou arguments....

I'm a celt fan but sad to say

Pierce doesnt have a legit shot at the mvp, but if somehow garnet or duncan are knocked out of it who knows. he's kind of an underated superstar (if that's possible), he produces equal stats to most of the other superstars such as tmac, kobe, iverson and so on, and is one of the top 4th quarter players in the league. He gets to the line, and NEVER misses a clutch shot, i'd take him over any player in the league with 12 mins left. With all that said, we suck this year, so no matter how good he can be, it's not gona matter.

T-Mac wont win because his team wont win
Iverson wont win because he's been hurt and the TO and shot pct.
Duncan won't win because garnet will
Garnet will win because he's the best player no doubt. Rebounds, passes, blocks, scores, plays great d, he's versitle, and doesnt turn over the ball.
Shaq won't win because of the 3 guys around him
Kobe wont win for the same reason
Baron won't win because like pierce he's not recognized as well, and just isnt as good as the other players.

my mvp voting would be
1. KG
2. Duncan
3. Pierce

Right..... Anyways averaging more than 2 t.o doesn't make a player unable to get MVP since Duncan is averaging 2.9 and KG 2.5. A more realistice goal for AI and Pierce is less than 3 t.o's per game, Iverson average 3.34 tpg when he won it in 2000-2001 so it really isn't relevant.

The last time I checked, Kevin Garnett's name wasn't Allen Iverson or Paul Pierce. Neither is Tim Duncan. This is the 2003-2004 season. Niether Paul Pierce or Allen Iverson will win it, and they can't get less than 2 TOs. The whole point of putting that up there was to illistrate how unrealistic them winning the MVP is.

Right..... Anyways averaging more than 2 t.o doesn't make a player unable to get MVP since Duncan is averaging 2.9 and KG 2.5. A more realistice goal for AI and Pierce is less than 3 t.o's per game, Iverson average 3.34 tpg when he won it in 2000-2001 so it really isn't relevant.

The last time I checked, Kevin Garnett's name wasn't Allen Iverson or Paul Pierce. Neither is Tim Duncan. This is the 2003-2004 season. Niether Paul Pierce or Allen Iverson will win it, and they can't get less than 2 TOs. The whole point of putting that up there was to illistrate how unrealistic them winning the MVP is.

I just misunderstood you, I thought you were implying that it was an achieveable goal.