Dumbest trade of this off-season

Like real basketball, as well as basketball video games? Talk about the NBA, NCAA, and other professional and amateur basketball leagues here.

was it a good trade for the Kings or not?

yes
7
28%
no
18
72%
 
Total votes : 25

Dumbest trade of this off-season

Postby The Big Racist on Wed Aug 06, 2003 7:30 am

Clark is a Jazz!!!

well why did Sacramento make this trade?? for cap space to resign Divac next off-season?
or for brad miller getting more playing time?
The Big Racist
 
Posts: 1101
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2003 11:37 pm

Postby TRUball on Wed Aug 06, 2003 7:42 am

that is the dumbest ever, ok keon clark and 2 2nd round draft picks, for 1 second round draft pick? what the hell? that is the dumbest trade this season
User avatar
TRUball
 
Posts: 1207
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 1:05 am

Postby LeBron James on Wed Aug 06, 2003 7:52 am

that wasnt good @all
User avatar
LeBron James
 
Posts: 690
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2003 6:35 am
Location: Cleveland

Postby Colin on Wed Aug 06, 2003 7:55 am

Mr. Layden, we found someone with your intelligence level.

Dumb trade.
C#
Image
Pretty Flaco
User avatar
Colin
 
Posts: 5913
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2003 7:02 am
Location: Van-City

Postby Tim Duncan on Wed Aug 06, 2003 7:57 am

Wow, that is a stupid trade, what were they thinking..
User avatar
Tim Duncan
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2003 1:45 pm
Location: Chile

Postby Vins15 on Wed Aug 06, 2003 8:03 am

yeap a very dumb trade..but good for Jazz though...they've been looking for a starting C forever...
User avatar
Vins15
 
Posts: 1786
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 3:08 pm
Location: Vancouver,BC

Postby Robby on Wed Aug 06, 2003 11:53 am

The Kings are trying to save some money by avoiding the luxury tax. They don't really need Clark as much because they have Miller.
User avatar
Robby
 
Posts: 520
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 4:20 am

Postby Andrew on Wed Aug 06, 2003 11:56 am

I think we have our first luxury tax trade of the offseason. As with all trades made because of salary cap/luxury tax reasons, it's terribly one-sided, but Clark and two second round picks for one second round pick?
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115084
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Postby Robby on Wed Aug 06, 2003 12:19 pm

Maybe the Jazz can actually win 20 games now.
User avatar
Robby
 
Posts: 520
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 4:20 am

Postby Andrew on Wed Aug 06, 2003 12:36 pm

Since the Jazz are possibly lottery bound, this trade might have been better had the Kings asked for their first round pick (which the Jazz would no doubt want to protect if it turns out to be top 3). At least than Sacramento would have a better chance at getting something out of the deal.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115084
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Postby Vins15 on Wed Aug 06, 2003 1:19 pm

Andrew wrote:Since the Jazz are possibly lottery bound, this trade might have been better had the Kings asked for their first round pick (which the Jazz would no doubt want to protect if it turns out to be top 3). At least than Sacramento would have a better chance at getting something out of the deal.


acutally all Kings get is a second rd pick from the Jazz not a first rd pick
User avatar
Vins15
 
Posts: 1786
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 3:08 pm
Location: Vancouver,BC

Postby TRUball on Wed Aug 06, 2003 2:54 pm

Vins15 wrote:
Andrew wrote:Since the Jazz are possibly lottery bound, this trade might have been better had the Kings asked for their first round pick (which the Jazz would no doubt want to protect if it turns out to be top 3). At least than Sacramento would have a better chance at getting something out of the deal.


acutally all Kings get is a second rd pick from the Jazz not a first rd pick


he was stating that is would of been better if it was for a 1st round hence: "this trade might have been better had the Kings asked for their first round pick". read abit more carefully. :wink:


still wit brad miller, keon clark was a good roleplayer

My 200th post! Yay :D
User avatar
TRUball
 
Posts: 1207
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 1:05 am

Postby ThisizaJackMove on Wed Aug 06, 2003 3:15 pm

WTF at least it coulda been a 1st round pick!
User avatar
ThisizaJackMove
 
Posts: 577
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2003 3:50 pm

Postby Andrew on Wed Aug 06, 2003 4:25 pm

acutally all Kings get is a second rd pick from the Jazz not a first rd pick


As kobes_4real said, I was saying the Kings should have asked for Utah's first round pick, which may be a lottery pick and hence much more useful.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115084
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Postby Vins15 on Wed Aug 06, 2003 4:32 pm

oh i see my bad :oops: i didn't read carefully enough...
User avatar
Vins15
 
Posts: 1786
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 3:08 pm
Location: Vancouver,BC

Postby Andrew on Wed Aug 06, 2003 4:37 pm

No worries. I actually had to go back and check to see if I'd made an error in my post. Sometimes I leave a word out here and there, which can cause confusion.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115084
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Postby Bourbon on Wed Aug 06, 2003 5:04 pm

As kobes_4real said, I was saying the Kings should have asked for Utah's first round pick, which may be a lottery pick and hence much more useful.


Asking for a first rounder would be a futile endeavor; there's no way Keon Clark's worthy of a lottery pick, not now anyway. (And yes, Jazz fans, I'm sorry, but Utah's heading for the lottery this year.)

Wow, that is a stupid trade, what were they thinking..


As Andrew noted, Sacramento was headed into Luxery Taxville, and needed to unload some salary. Still, it's not like Sacramento's having an atrocious offseason either; you could essentially say they lost Keon Clark for Brad Miller.
Bourbon
 
Posts: 105
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 3:35 pm

Postby Andrew on Wed Aug 06, 2003 5:09 pm

Asking for a first rounder would be a futile endeavor; there's no way Keon Clark's worthy of a lottery pick, not now anyway. (And yes, Jazz fans, I'm sorry, but Utah's heading for the lottery this year.)


Maybe so, but surely Keon Clark and two second round picks is worth more than a single second round pick.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115084
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Postby Clinton on Wed Aug 06, 2003 5:25 pm

This trade still doesn't make sense if it was to avoid the luxury tax. Surely the Kings could have got more than a second round pick. Clark could start at centre on all but a few teams and they trade him and TWO second round picks for ONE second round pick. The Kings would've got ripped even if Clark wasn't in the deal. Stupidest trade this offseason easily. Jazz GM for GM of the year. Just in front of McHale.
User avatar
Clinton
 
Posts: 823
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 6:32 pm
Location: Pato son....

Postby Boyk on Wed Aug 06, 2003 10:13 pm

wierd, wot are they thinkin, they coulda got a first rnder for clark
Image
Thanks to TEH G.O.A.T for Sig
Formerly known as Laddas
Watch out for Kobe,Melo n the Lakers!
User avatar
Boyk
 
Posts: 1697
Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2002 1:51 am
Location: Kalgoorlie, Western Australia

Postby Power And Proud on Wed Aug 06, 2003 11:02 pm

this is a shocking trade for Sacramento
User avatar
Power And Proud
 
Posts: 694
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 8:59 pm
Location: Australia

Postby The Big Racist on Wed Aug 06, 2003 11:27 pm

MJForever wrote:this is a shocking trade for Sacramento


yeah! Sixers wanted Keon Clark but they sacto didnt trade him in 4 team trade.... :roll:
The Big Racist
 
Posts: 1101
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2003 11:37 pm

Postby LeBron James on Thu Aug 07, 2003 2:35 am

good for jazz!
User avatar
LeBron James
 
Posts: 690
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2003 6:35 am
Location: Cleveland

Postby d3vilm4n on Fri Aug 08, 2003 7:24 am

I would have thought it was obvious that the kings are unloading Keon's contract and the only way they could get the Jazz to agree to take it was to include 2 second rounders, which will be getting close to the last pick in the draft, and as the Kings have a good team already and only seem to use 3 subs a game, 2nd rounders are nothing to them.
d3vilm4n
 
Posts: 82
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2002 10:26 am
Location: Waitakere City, New Zealand

Postby magius on Fri Aug 08, 2003 10:20 am

but sac's 2 2nd rounders are almost worthless...... at least if they get utah they have a chance of maybe number 30-35, etc.. there are some alright players still around mid-draft.

i dont see utah giving up a #1 (maybe) - 10 pick for clark and 2 very late 2nds. i think anyone who had a fairer offer for clark was offering a player with basically the same salary, thus defeating the purpose of dumping salary. probably sac management just wanted to get their tax troubles over with in one instance instead of in many smaller instances. plus clark is dispensable on that team.

arnold schwarzanager for SENATOR!! :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:
User avatar
magius
 
Posts: 1406
Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2002 3:37 pm

Next

Return to NBA & Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests