The X wrote:Why play for nothing (after taxes) as a backup PG to Jonny friggin' Flynn?!?
Fair enough, but why declare for the Draft when it wouldn't be financially feasible to even go to the NBA? I see what you're saying here...
The X wrote:To the people saying you shouldn't enter your name unless you're willing to play where you're drafted, who's to say he's not once his current contract is up in Spain? I don't see you getting upset with teams who have absolutely no intention of bringing in a player that they have drafted for at least 1/2/3 years (Blazers picking Euros, possibly Mills & other teams picking Euros or not having roster space). You can't say it's bad for player to do it, but not also chastise each & every team for doing the exact same thing.
...but as I see it, the circumstances are a little different. A maximum of 15 players can make the cut for an NBA team by the opening night of the new season and if you're drafted 60th overall, chances are you're not going to make the cut and may never make the cut (and who's to say that some 60th picks feel insulted and/or have no interest in coming to the NBA upon being drafted?). On the other side of things, if you enter the NBA Draft you are presumably interested in playing in the NBA and willing to do so.
Don't get me wrong, at this point I'm not jumping on the "Rubio is a dick" bandwagon because you're right, it is a business and it makes sense financially for Rubio to play out his contract rather than buy it out. But at the same time, I think it's a fair question to ask if this is the case, why declare for the Draft now? I think the situation with Fran Vasquez has probably left a bad taste in a lot of people's mouths as well. In the coaching ranks, it was a similar situation with Billy Donovan. If you're not interested in the NBA, why send out feelers and then sign a contract? I also have to wonder if it's merely a leverage tactic, and if he'd feel differently if he could be traded somewhere else, leading to a Steve Francis-like situation. I think in that situation people would certainly be entitled to calling him a dick or a tool or whatever.
It raises another interesting issue though. Perhaps NBA teams should be able to pay a bigger percentage of the costs when buying out a contract, if not the whole thing. That way, if an NBA team was so keen to bring in a player with a contract elsewhere that needs to be bought out, it would be up to them to take the financial hit (or at least a bigger chunk of it).