Sat Jul 26, 2014 3:23 am
Sat Jul 26, 2014 4:10 am
Sat Jul 26, 2014 4:20 am
JaoSming wrote:yes, I do think it is too much to ask to provide consumers data that shareholders don't even get
Sat Jul 26, 2014 5:04 am
Sat Jul 26, 2014 6:06 am
Sat Jul 26, 2014 8:24 am
Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:48 am
JBulls wrote:Oh, my bad I thought it was a publicly traded company for some reason or another...
SEC regulations require publicly owned companies to disclose certain types of business and financial data on a regular basis to the SEC and to the company's stockholders. The SEC also requires disclosure of relevant business and financial information to potential investors when new securities, such as stocks and bonds, are issued to the public, although exceptions are made for small issues and private placements.
Publicly owned companies prepare two annual reports, one for the SEC and one for their shareholders. Form 10-K is the annual report made to the SEC, and its content and form are strictly governed by federal statutes. It contains detailed financial and operating information, as well as a management response to specific questions about the company's operations.
Sat Jul 26, 2014 3:06 pm
JaoSming wrote:You also need to factor in the costs though. Every online user downloads 60+ mb of updates. There is money that goes into the servers, even if no one uses them, for online play. And of course the cost to the people that make the PC port. Remember that isn't a simple "compile" and taa daaaaa PC version. There are scaleable graphic options that need to be put in place and of course the stripping of features. This doesn't even count the digital store cuts from the sale or the costs to make the discs.
The argument that porting and selling the PC version for near 100% profit is silly. It ain't free money.
Its a big discussion that is, just like the fate of 2K15, all speculative since none of us are in the industry and the only one who is can't talk about it.
Sun Jul 27, 2014 3:42 pm