benji wrote:
Next year they need to make a Dennis Rodman Edition, you could probably make a nice control system surrounding his actions in game.
benji wrote:
SoF'nAwesome wrote:Anyway, these jokes are getting boring.
SoF'nAwesome wrote:Well, that's pretty much the difference between robots and humans. You can't always describe what you are feeling in words, you just feel it. No words, speechless.
'I like it because it's purdy'
good enough reason
M3r$uRy wrote:It was about time we got a LeBron cover... I wonder how much they paid him!
The guys in 2K have shown that they are not afraid of spending when it comes to marketing their product.
The main cover photo is pretty nice but I would really like a special effect on it and I wouldn't mind at all if this giant head wasn't on the background
SteveHTOWN wrote:A game featuring LBJ on a Windows OS. I'd bet that game crashes after the 3rd quarter...
Gigabyte wrote:M3r$uRy wrote:The main cover photo is pretty nice but I would really like a special effect on it and I wouldn't mind at all if this giant head wasn't on the background
Yeah, I totally agree with your last sentence.An effect or two wouldn't have hurt.
shadowgrin wrote:You don't have to be Shakespearean in reasoning about it.
SoF'nAwesome wrote:shadowgrin wrote:You don't have to be Shakespearean in reasoning about it.
Oh, you mean don't be poetic on art? Well, that's pretty much your highlight reel.
SoF'nAwesome wrote:Oh, you mean don't be poetic on art? Well, that's pretty much your highlight reel.
shadowgrin wrote:You present the reason for your perception even if it's just simply liking or hating it.
Even those are good enough reasons, instead of going PLEAS STAHP IT! ART IS BEYOND BOUNDARIES OF REASON! STAHP!
hiteshom wrote:I think you two just have something against eachother, get over it, you're fighting in every single thread
shadowgrin wrote:Who said not to be poetic on art?..
You don't have to be Shakespearean in reasoning about it.
shadowgrin wrote:I wonder if that pose is intended so his hairline won't be noticed.
"You don't have to", it's intended to mean that the person addressed by it has the option of choosing to be detailed or simple in his reasoning. An OPTION and not a fact or strictly followed requirement. Did you even read my second post regarding this art matter?
...explaining stuff like this reminded me of an idiot I know...
Uros12 wrote:Seems like everyone forgot about Jay Z,wonder if they will put him back
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests