by wabenne on Fri Jun 04, 2010 1:52 am
I agree with you guys NBA lIve 2010 built a solid foundation for where it was going making some big improvments but obviously the game lacked in depth compared to a 2k that had an indepth "Association Mode" "NBA Blacktop" where you could play 1on1, 2on2, 3on3, 4on4, 5on5. you could practice freethrows and they would keep percentages, scimmages and so much more. If 2k did beat Live in 2010 is was defiently in the depth of the game so if Elite once to be competative it has to get more to the depth of the game not just in Dynasty mode (which is more important) but just in the overall things we can do in the game.
Now with that said and after playing 2k10 live is def lagging in the moves department so I totally understand them changing the controls to give the gamer more control of the player and of course u can do more with the shot on the stick then you can with a button for example as the Creative Director said switching hands in the air. But 2k already does that and a lot of other stuff. So my thing is Elite has to understand that this is not groundbreaking this is catching up. So therefore the focus has to be on Dynasty and the overall adding up depth to the game and things that we are allowed to do that will make Elite on top again. I like what was being said in the gamespot article but we all meet that with skepticism because of how we are always hearing this will be the best game and this will change basketball then after one season or half a season we don't want to play anymore. More then people just liking 2k better I think we got frustrated with Live. Like 2k even gives the option of 29,56 or 82 games like what in Live producers minds are telling them that gamers don't want that option they have taken away to much control for the gamers.