Mon May 01, 2006 8:28 pm
Mon May 01, 2006 8:38 pm
Mark. wrote:Well done X, your top 25 now
And to go off topic,
Whats the process for determining the use of Cash on Property Plant and Equipment?? I cant be bothered finding it in the textbook and its sooo long ago that I got taught this![]()
Mon May 01, 2006 8:41 pm
Mon May 01, 2006 8:44 pm
Mark. wrote::lol: I thought you were an accountant :p Nah jst jokes, its just stuff that we were taught in 6th and 7th form, but odnt owrry I found the template in the book, its for working out the figures to go in the statement of cash flows![]()
Mon May 01, 2006 9:05 pm
Mon May 01, 2006 9:32 pm
Mon May 01, 2006 9:37 pm
Mon May 01, 2006 9:52 pm
Sit wrote:Stick with the zone... hey, do you know how a 1-2-2 zone works? Ive heard that its good against good shooting teams.
And how effective can a Box and 1 be?
Mon May 01, 2006 10:05 pm
Mon May 01, 2006 10:08 pm
Mon May 01, 2006 10:14 pm
Sit wrote:I was thinking about that making the playoffs thing... wat were u smoking X?
And yeh man... the 1-2-2 is just how u explained it... i was just wanting to know if u knew how the players move in it?
and I think we would go with a box and 1...
Mon May 01, 2006 10:19 pm
Mon May 01, 2006 10:32 pm
The X wrote:I'd assume they'd move just like a normal zone....if ball goes left, zone moves left, etc, etc....as with all zones, it depends how far you want to extend it....against a shooting team, you'd have it so that the zone movement extended out to the 3pt line....however I don't think this zone would solve the problem of containing outside shooters....
Tue May 02, 2006 2:18 am
Tue May 02, 2006 8:03 pm
Jugs wrote:Wow, who would've thought the Blazers would go 6-1 and place themselves 8th in the Western Conference. Nice month indeed. Kirk Hinrich got Player of the month, who would've guessed.
Sit wrote:The X wrote:I'd assume they'd move just like a normal zone....if ball goes left, zone moves left, etc, etc....as with all zones, it depends how far you want to extend it....against a shooting team, you'd have it so that the zone movement extended out to the 3pt line....however I don't think this zone would solve the problem of containing outside shooters....
- I've thought about that and the main thing is we want to force them to pass inside cause they got a very weak big man. So i was thinking more man-on-man than zone. But I'm scared that my team's inexperience and lack of quickness will get exploited. The team we play has 5 very quick guards and their forwards are pretty good shooters too... Maybe a trap can help?
Thierry² wrote:Nice job X... 6-1
Tue May 02, 2006 9:42 pm
Tue May 02, 2006 10:14 pm
Sit wrote:Their team has four very good ballhandlers... all have played PG for rep teams.
Tue May 09, 2006 8:26 pm
Tue May 09, 2006 8:30 pm
X's Sig wrote:Fighting Irish Watch: Record: 1-0, tight defense helped Irish win a sloppy, low-scoring game by 9pts. X's Stat Line: 14pts, 14rebs (played point forward).
X's Season Averages: 14.0ppg, 14.0rpg, 2.0apg, 3.0spg, 1.0bpg, 1.0TOpg
Tue May 09, 2006 8:57 pm
Mark. wrote:Yeah dude im in a similar situation, ya just do what ya can eh.X's Sig wrote:Fighting Irish Watch: Record: 1-0, tight defense helped Irish win a sloppy, low-scoring game by 9pts. X's Stat Line: 14pts, 14rebs (played point forward).
X's Season Averages: 14.0ppg, 14.0rpg, 2.0apg, 3.0spg, 1.0bpg, 1.0TOpg
Nice stuff on the win, do you get all your stats recorded? thats pretty efficient ball handling, what was the end score?
Tue May 09, 2006 9:06 pm
Tue May 09, 2006 9:12 pm
Tue May 09, 2006 9:36 pm
Wed May 10, 2006 8:05 am
Wed May 10, 2006 9:58 pm
Anthony15 wrote:GJ on #25, isn't very good for a Good 29 page dynasty, though!